Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 196, Issue 4, Pages 483-489 (October 2008)


View previous. 6 of 44 View next.

A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery

Tanir M. Allweis, M.D.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Zvi Kaufman, M.D.b, Shlomo Lelcuk, M.D.c, Itzhak Pappo, M.D.d, Tami Karni, M.D.d, Shlomo Schneebaum, M.D.e, Rona Spector, M.D.c, Asher Schindel, M.D.c, Dan Hershko, M.D.f, Moshe Zilberman, M.D.g, Joel Sayfan, M.D.h, Yuri Berlin, M.D.h, Amram Hadary, M.D.i, Oded Olsha, M.D.j, Haim Paran, M.D.b, Mordechai Gutman, M.D.b, Moshe Carmon, M.D.j

Received 23 April 2008; received in revised form 29 May 2008

Abstract 

Background

This randomized, double-arm trial was designed to study the benefit of a novel device (MarginProbe, Dune Medical Devices, Caesarea, Israel) in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and the associated reduction in reoperations.

Methods

In the device group, the probe was applied to the lumpectomy specimen and additional tissue was excised according to device readings. Study arms were compared by reoperation rates and by correct surgical reaction confirmed by histology.

Results

Three hundred patients were enrolled. Device use was associated with improved correct surgical reaction, defined as additional re-excision in all histologically detected positive margins, with tumor within 1 mm of inked margin. The repeat lumpectomy rate was significantly reduced by 56% in the device arm: 5.6% versus 12.7% in the control arm. There were no differences in excised tissue volume or cosmetic outcome.

Conclusions

Intraoperative use of the MarginProbe for positive margin detection is safe and effective in BCS and decreases the rate of repeat operations.

a Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

b Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel

c Rabin Medical Center, Belinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel

d Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zrifin Beer-Yaakov, Israel

e Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

f Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

g The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriya, Israel

h Haemek Medical Center, Afula, Israel

i Sieff Government Hospital, Safed, Israel

j Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972-2-5844111; fax: +972-2-5844232

 Supported by Dune Medical Devices, Caesarea, Israel.

PII: S0002-9610(08)00487-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.024


View previous. 6 of 44 View next.

Advertisement