Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 198, Issue 2, Pages 283-286 (August 2009)


View previous. 25 of 41 View next.

A novel ultrasound-guided electrosurgical loop device for intra-operative excision of breast lesions; an improvement in surgical technique

Richard E. Fine, M.D.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Michael A. Schwalke, M.D.b, James V. Pellicane, M.D.c, Deanna J. Attai, M.D., F.A.C.S.d

Received 3 October 2008; received in revised form 6 January 2009

Abstract 

Background

The rate of involved margins after the excision of breast lesions using standard surgical techniques has historically ranged from approximately 20% to 45%. The localization and excision of breast lesions using intraoperative ultrasound has provided significant improvement. The authors report their collective experience with a novel technique utilizing the Phantom flexible loop electrosurgical device under ultrasound guidance for the intraoperative excision of breast lesions.

Methods

Seventy-nine breast lesions were excised using the Phantom device with intraoperative ultrasound. Rate of reexcision, excised specimen size, and size of the lumpectomy incision were reviewed.

Results

Fifty-nine of 79 lesions were malignant. Fifty-one (86.4%) had noninvolved final margins; 8 (13.6%) involved margins. The average specimen size was 21.3 cm3, compared with a range of 60 to 100 cm3 in the literature.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate improved efficiency, a decrease in the volume of excision, smaller incision size, and very low need for reoperation secondary to involved margins using the Phantom device for real-time, ultrasound-guided lumpectomy.

a Advanced Breast Care, Marietta, GA, USA

b Shreveport Breast Center, Shreveport, LA, USA

c Virginia Breast Center, Midlothian, VA, USA

d Center for Breast Care, Glendale, CA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: 770-422-1988; fax: 770-874-0226

 The authors disclose a proprietary interest in Rubicor Medical, Inc (Redwood City, CA), the manufacturer of the device used in this study.

PII: S0002-9610(09)00231-1

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.026


View previous. 25 of 41 View next.

Advertisement